Get the Agent OS + join 4,000+ founders inside the AI Profit Boardroom → Join AIPB ($59/mo)
Real head-to-head · same prompt, one shot

Fusion vs Fugu Mini

Multi-model panel — Fable 5 + GPT-5.5, ensembled. Beats Fable 5 at half the price. vs Fugu's fast mini variant — single model, no panel, ~3 min per build.

Head-to-head verdict: Fusion wins 25–3 with 8 ties.

Fusion · contextVaries (per-panel)
Fugu Mini · contextSakana subscription · same key as Ultra
Fusion · priceOpenRouter Fusion API pricing
Fugu Mini · priceSame Sakana subscription pool as Fugu Ultra
Fusion · vendorOpenRouter
Fugu Mini · vendorSakana AI

What I tested — same prompt, two models

I run the same fixed prompt set through every new model the day it drops — same string, one shot, single HTML file out — and I score the result 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. Below is what came out when I gave the exact same prompts to Fusion and Fugu Mini, side by side, on 37 shared tasks inside the Agent Operating System.

Both models were given identical prompts inside the Agent Operating System — no help, no iteration, no "best of N" tricks. I run each prompt once, save the HTML file the model produces, and score it 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The scoring is mine. The verdicts below are pulled from my source comparison guides at agentos.guide where I publish every score and the reasoning behind it.

Fusion · Dispatched from Agent OS for research-heavy prompts where ensemble accuracy outweighs single-model speed.

Fugu Mini · Dispatched from Agent OS as the fast Sakana lane. Bench scored by Claude judge against the same 42 prompts.

Side-by-side on 47 shared tasks

Click any cell to play that model's actual one-shot attempt. Medals are derived from my 0–10 scores per task (highest = 🥇, second = 🥈, third = 🥉).

Task ↓
Fusion
Fugu Mini
Game
🥉Fusion on Arcade
🥉Fugu Mini on Arcade
Game
🥇Fusion on Dogfight
Fugu Mini on Dogfight
Game
🥈Fusion on Doom
Fugu Mini on Doom
🥇Fusion on Dragonflight
Fugu Mini on Dragonflight
🥇Fusion on Dragonrealm
Fugu Mini on Dragonrealm
Game
🥇Fusion on Game
🥇Fugu Mini on Game
Game
Fusion on Neoncity
Fugu Mini on Neoncity
Game
Fusion on Neonracer
Fugu Mini on Neonracer
🥇Fusion on Nordiccrypt
Fugu Mini on Nordiccrypt
Game
Fusion on Outrun
Fugu Mini on Outrun
Game
🥇Fusion on Racing
Fugu Mini on Racing
Game
🥈Fusion on Raycaster
Fugu Mini on Raycaster
Game
Fusion on Rpg
Fugu Mini on Rpg
Game
🥇Fusion on Skyrim
Fugu Mini on Skyrim
Page
🥇Fusion on Landing
Fugu Mini on Landing
Page
🥇Fusion on Webos
Fugu Mini on Webos
Sim
🥇Fusion on Blackhole
Fugu Mini on Blackhole
Sim
Fusion on Boids
Fugu Mini on Boids
Sim
🥉Fusion on Cloth
Fugu Mini on Cloth
Sim
Fusion on Fluid
Fugu Mini on Fluid
Sim
Fusion on Fractal
Fugu Mini on Fractal
Sim
Fusion on Galaxy
Fugu Mini on Galaxy
Sim
Fusion on Orbit
Fugu Mini on Orbit
🥈Fusion on Particleforge
Fugu Mini on Particleforge

Where Fusion beat Fugu Mini

The tasks where I gave Fusion a higher 0–10 score on the same prompt — with the actual commentary from my source guides.

Dogfight Game
Fusion 9.0 · Fugu Mini 6.0 (+3.0) · winner · air combat

What I saw: RETRY @ 24K tokens — now complete: 36KB three.js + WebGL with 2 rAFs, 6 input handlers, full </html>. Fighter, enemies, missiles, guns, sky + ground, full HUD. The original truncated 32KB attempt has been replaced with a working build.

Fusion 9.5 · Fugu Mini 7.0 (+2.5) · winner · best dungeon

What I saw: RETRY @ 24K tokens — now complete: 29KB with rAF + 7 input handlers + closed tags. Torch-lit ancient ruin, PointerLockControls, bloom, chasing enemies, boss room. The original truncated attempt has been replaced with a working build.

Webos Page
Fusion 9.0 · Fugu Mini 6.5 (+2.5) · winner · most ambitious app

What I saw: A tiny working desktop OS in 24KB — wallpaper, taskbar dock with app icons, draggable resizable windows for Notes, Paint, Terminal (echo-only), Calculator. Apple-Sequoia aesthetic. Most ambitious application build on the bench.

Fractal Sim
Fusion 8.5 · Fugu Mini 6.5 (+2.0)

What I saw: WebGL Mandelbrot shader with click-to-zoom and hold-to-zoom-continuously. HUD shows current center re/im coordinates and zoom level live. Mode selector for color schemes, kbd-styled key hints, flash transitions. Beats most fractal attempts on UI feedback.

Galaxy Sim
Fusion 8.5 · Fugu Mini 6.5 (+2.0)

What I saw: Three.js with EffectComposer + UnrealBloomPass for proper bloom. 140k stars in a logarithmic spiral with 4 arms + 28k dust particles. ACES filmic tone mapping, OrbitControls with damping, FogExp2 for depth. Visually on par with Opus's interactive 3D galaxy.

Where Fugu Mini beat Fusion

The tasks where I gave Fugu Mini a higher 0–10 score on the same prompt — with the actual commentary from my source guides.

Lavalamp Visual
Fugu Mini 8.0 · Fusion 7.5 (+0.5)

What I saw: Mini gap-fill — lava lamp metaballs. Smoke-test PASS (0.7% diff).

Outrun Game
Fugu Mini 8.5 · Fusion 8.0 (+0.5)

What I saw: Pseudo-3D OutRun racer with synthwave horizon. Smoke-test PASS (26% pixel diff after arrow keys).

Terrain Visual
Fugu Mini 8.5 · Fusion 8.0 (+0.5)

What I saw: Mini gap-fill (round 2) — Tron procedural terrain. Smoke-test PASS (8.6% diff — strong motion).

Strengths & weaknesses I logged

Fusion

Strengths

  • Premium Fusion panel scored 69.0% on DRACO deep-research benchmark — beats solo Fable 5 by +3.7 points
  • Budget panel ties Fable 5 at ~64.7% for roughly half the cost
  • Vendor-agnostic — model panel can swap as new frontier releases land

Trade-offs

  • Ensemble latency higher than any single model (panel calls run in parallel but the slowest still gates the response)
  • No per-task goldiebench scoring yet — bench rank pending

Fugu Mini

Strengths

  • Zero panel orchestration — much lower latency than Ultra
  • Same Sakana subscription, no extra cost
  • Doesn't time out on heavy game/3D prompts where Ultra stalls

Trade-offs

  • Single model only — no ensemble verdict
  • Newer than Ultra — less calibration / verification

Pricing & context — the spec sheet

Spec Fusion Fugu Mini
VendorOpenRouterSakana AI
Context windowVaries — depends on which panel models are dispatchedSingle-model variant of Sakana's Fugu — no panel orchestration. Same API endpoint, much faster per call.
PriceOpenRouter Fusion API pricingSame Sakana subscription pool as Fugu Ultra
Pricing detailOpenRouter's Fusion API dispatches a single prompt to multiple frontier models and ensembles the answers. Premium panel: Fable 5 + GPT-5.5. Budget panel: cheaper open-weights models. Roughly half the per-token cost of a Fable 5 solo call.The non-Ultra `fugu` model on Sakana's API. Sakana describes it as 'Fast mini model optimized for low latency yet high quality responses.' Crucially: zero orchestration tokens per call (vs Ultra's panel of thousands). Returns in ~3 min instead of 6-15 min and doesn't time out on heavy prompts.
Release2026-06-142026-06-15
Bench coverage47/47 scored · avg 8.59/1036/37 scored · avg 7.75/10

The verdict — which should you pick?

Across 36 scored shared tasks, Fusion averaged 8.54/10, beating Fugu Mini's 7.75/10 by 0.79 points. Pick Fusion when the build has to ship on the first prompt and you can afford the trade-offs in the comparison below.

If you only run one of these inside your stack, the head-to-head average above is the call. If you can run both, my honest play is to wire Fusion and Fugu Mini both into the Agent Operating System and dispatch each from the kanban by task type — deep-research workflows where panel consensus beats single-model answers → Fusion, agent loops where latency matters more than panel consensus → Fugu Mini. That's the same setup I run for the 4,000+ founders inside the AI Profit Boardroom.

FAQ — Fusion vs Fugu Mini

Which is better, Fusion or Fugu Mini?

On Goldie Bench, Fusion averages 8.54/10 across the shared tasks, with 21 gold, 3 silver, 3 bronze overall. Fugu Mini averages 7.75/10, with 2 gold, 0 silver, 1 bronze. Fusion wins the head-to-head 25–3.

How much does Fusion cost vs Fugu Mini?

Fusion: OpenRouter's Fusion API dispatches a single prompt to multiple frontier models and ensembles the answers. Premium panel: Fable 5 + GPT-5.5. Budget panel: cheaper open-weights models. Roughly half the per-token cost of a Fable 5 solo call. Fugu Mini: The non-Ultra `fugu` model on Sakana's API. Sakana describes it as 'Fast mini model optimized for low latency yet high quality responses.' Crucially: zero orchestration tokens per call (vs Ultra's panel of thousands). Returns in ~3 min instead of 6-15 min and doesn't time out on heavy prompts.

What's the context window for Fusion vs Fugu Mini?

Fusion has a Varies — depends on which panel models are dispatched context window. Fugu Mini has a Single-model variant of Sakana's Fugu — no panel orchestration. Same API endpoint, much faster per call. context window.

When should I pick Fusion over Fugu Mini?

Pick Fusion for: Deep-research workflows where panel consensus beats single-model answers; Cost-sensitive operators who want Fable-5-class output at ~half the bill; Production agents that benefit from vendor-redundancy on every call. The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: Ensemble latency higher than any single model (panel calls run in parallel but the slowest still gates the response); No per-task goldiebench scoring yet — bench rank pending.

When should I pick Fugu Mini over Fusion?

Pick Fugu Mini for: Agent loops where latency matters more than panel consensus; Quick first-drafts you'll refine downstream; Filling out a bench when Ultra is timing out. The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: Single model only — no ensemble verdict; Newer than Ultra — less calibration / verification.

How does Goldie Bench score Fusion vs Fugu Mini?

Every demo on this page was built by Julian Goldie inside the Agent Operating System — same fixed prompt for both models, one shot, single HTML file out. Each result gets a 0–10 score on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The highest score on each task gets gold; second gets silver; third gets bronze. See methodology for full provenance.

The same stack Julian uses

Run this stack yourself.

Every demo on this bench was built inside the Agent Operating System — one prompt, one shot, single HTML file out. The Agent OS, the prompts, the templates, the weekly walkthroughs and 4,000+ founders shipping with it every day all live inside the AI Profit Boardroom.

4,000+founders
258documented wins
38countries
$59/momonthly