Get the Agent OS + join 4,000+ founders inside the AI Profit Boardroom → Join AIPB ($59/mo)
Real head-to-head · same prompt, one shot

Fugu Mini vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

Fugu's fast mini variant — single model, no panel, ~3 min per build. vs DeepSeek's flagship tier — benched head-to-head against its own cheap Flash.

Fugu Mini · contextSakana subscription · same key as Ultra
DeepSeek V4 Pro · context1M tokens
Fugu Mini · priceSame Sakana subscription pool as Fugu Ultra
DeepSeek V4 Pro · priceAPI · pro tier
Fugu Mini · vendorSakana AI
DeepSeek V4 Pro · vendorDeepSeek

What I tested — same prompt, two models

I run the same fixed prompt set through every new model the day it drops — same string, one shot, single HTML file out — and I score the result 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. Below is what came out when I gave the exact same prompts to Fugu Mini and DeepSeek V4 Pro, side by side, on 37 shared tasks inside the Agent Operating System.

Both models were given identical prompts inside the Agent Operating System — no help, no iteration, no "best of N" tricks. I run each prompt once, save the HTML file the model produces, and score it 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The scoring is mine. The verdicts below are pulled from my source comparison guides at agentos.guide where I publish every score and the reasoning behind it.

Fugu Mini · Dispatched from Agent OS as the fast Sakana lane. Bench scored by Claude judge against the same 42 prompts.

DeepSeek V4 Pro · Benched on all 50 GoldieBench tasks via api.deepseek.com with the same pipeline as the Flash 0731 run, then published as a live side-by-side: goldiebench.com/vs-live/deepseek-flash-vs-pro.html loads both builds of every task in twin panes.

Side-by-side on 50 shared tasks

Click any cell to play that model's actual one-shot attempt. Medals are derived from my 0–10 scores per task (highest = 🥇, second = 🥈, third = 🥉).

Task ↓
Fugu Mini
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Game
🥉Fugu Mini on Arcade
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Arcade
Game
Fugu Mini on Dogfight
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Dogfight
Game
Fugu Mini on Doom
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Doom
Fugu Mini on Dragonflight
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Dragonflight
Fugu Mini on Dragonrealm
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Dragonrealm
Game
🥇Fugu Mini on Game
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Game
Game
Fugu Mini on Neoncity
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Neoncity
Game
Fugu Mini on Neonracer
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Neonracer
Fugu Mini on Nordiccrypt
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Nordiccrypt
Game
Fugu Mini on Outrun
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Outrun
Game
Fugu Mini on Racing
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Racing
Game
Fugu Mini on Raycaster
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Raycaster
Game
Fugu Mini on Rpg
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Rpg
Game
Fugu Mini on Skyrim
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Skyrim
Page
Fugu Mini on Landing
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Landing
Page
Fugu Mini on Webos
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Webos
Sim
Fugu Mini on Blackhole
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Blackhole
Sim
Fugu Mini on Boids
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Boids
Sim
Fugu Mini on Cloth
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Cloth
Sim
Fugu Mini on Fluid
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Fluid
Sim
Fugu Mini on Fractal
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Fractal
Sim
Fugu Mini on Galaxy
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Galaxy
Sim
Fugu Mini on Orbit
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Orbit
Fugu Mini on Particleforge
DeepSeek V4 Pro on Particleforge

Strengths & weaknesses I logged

Fugu Mini

Strengths

  • Zero panel orchestration — much lower latency than Ultra
  • Same Sakana subscription, no extra cost
  • Doesn't time out on heavy game/3D prompts where Ultra stalls

Trade-offs

  • Single model only — no ensemble verdict
  • Newer than Ultra — less calibration / verification

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Strengths

  • Flagship reasoning tier on the same official API and 1M context as Flash
  • Ran the identical 50-prompt set as V4 Flash 0731 — a clean same-vendor A/B
  • Reasoning-first: thinks before writing every build

Trade-offs

  • Unranked — builds are on the bench but not yet scored by the Opus vision judge
  • Slower and pricier per build than Flash — the whole question is whether that buys quality

Pricing & context — the spec sheet

Spec Fugu Mini DeepSeek V4 Pro
VendorSakana AIDeepSeek
Context windowSingle-model variant of Sakana's Fugu — no panel orchestration. Same API endpoint, much faster per call.1,000,000-token context window
PriceSame Sakana subscription pool as Fugu UltraAPI · pro tier
Pricing detailThe non-Ultra `fugu` model on Sakana's API. Sakana describes it as 'Fast mini model optimized for low latency yet high quality responses.' Crucially: zero orchestration tokens per call (vs Ultra's panel of thousands). Returns in ~3 min instead of 6-15 min and doesn't time out on heavy prompts.DeepSeek's flagship tier, benched on `deepseek-v4-pro` via api.deepseek.com — the exact same 50 one-shot prompts, skill-infused game prompt and pipeline as the V4 Flash 0731 run, so the two runs are directly comparable side by side. DeepSeek's own line on the 0731 Flash refresh is that its post-training now beats the older V4-Pro-Preview — this run tests the current Pro against that claim.
Release2026-06-152026-07
Bench coverage36/37 scored · avg 7.75/100/50 scored · avg —

The verdict — which should you pick?

Not enough scored shared tasks yet for a head-to-head average. The live demos for both are on the matrix above — play them and form your own opinion.

If you only run one of these inside your stack, the head-to-head average above is the call. If you can run both, my honest play is to wire Fugu Mini and DeepSeek V4 Pro both into the Agent Operating System and dispatch each from the kanban by task type — agent loops where latency matters more than panel consensus → Fugu Mini, checking whether deepseek's pro tier is worth the premium over flash 0731 → DeepSeek V4 Pro. That's the same setup I run for the 4,000+ founders inside the AI Profit Boardroom.

FAQ — Fugu Mini vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

Which is better, Fugu Mini or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

On Goldie Bench, Fugu Mini averages no scored verdicts yet across the shared tasks, with 2 gold, 0 silver, 1 bronze overall. DeepSeek V4 Pro averages no scored verdicts yet, with 0 gold, 0 silver, 0 bronze. Not enough scored shared tasks yet to call a winner.

How much does Fugu Mini cost vs DeepSeek V4 Pro?

Fugu Mini: The non-Ultra `fugu` model on Sakana's API. Sakana describes it as 'Fast mini model optimized for low latency yet high quality responses.' Crucially: zero orchestration tokens per call (vs Ultra's panel of thousands). Returns in ~3 min instead of 6-15 min and doesn't time out on heavy prompts. DeepSeek V4 Pro: DeepSeek's flagship tier, benched on `deepseek-v4-pro` via api.deepseek.com — the exact same 50 one-shot prompts, skill-infused game prompt and pipeline as the V4 Flash 0731 run, so the two runs are directly comparable side by side. DeepSeek's own line on the 0731 Flash refresh is that its post-training now beats the older V4-Pro-Preview — this run tests the current Pro against that claim.

What's the context window for Fugu Mini vs DeepSeek V4 Pro?

Fugu Mini has a Single-model variant of Sakana's Fugu — no panel orchestration. Same API endpoint, much faster per call. context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro has a 1,000,000-token context window context window.

When should I pick Fugu Mini over DeepSeek V4 Pro?

Pick Fugu Mini for: Agent loops where latency matters more than panel consensus; Quick first-drafts you'll refine downstream; Filling out a bench when Ultra is timing out. The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: Single model only — no ensemble verdict; Newer than Ultra — less calibration / verification.

When should I pick DeepSeek V4 Pro over Fugu Mini?

Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro for: Checking whether DeepSeek's pro tier is worth the premium over Flash 0731; Hard single-shot builds where extra reasoning depth may pay off. The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: Unranked — builds are on the bench but not yet scored by the Opus vision judge; Slower and pricier per build than Flash — the whole question is whether that buys quality.

How does Goldie Bench score Fugu Mini vs DeepSeek V4 Pro?

Every demo on this page was built by Julian Goldie inside the Agent Operating System — same fixed prompt for both models, one shot, single HTML file out. Each result gets a 0–10 score on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The highest score on each task gets gold; second gets silver; third gets bronze. See methodology for full provenance.

The same stack Julian uses

Run this stack yourself.

Every demo on this bench was built inside the Agent Operating System — one prompt, one shot, single HTML file out. The Agent OS, the prompts, the templates, the weekly walkthroughs and 4,000+ founders shipping with it every day all live inside the AI Profit Boardroom.

4,000+founders
258documented wins
38countries
$59/momonthly