Real head-to-head · same prompt, one shot

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Mythos 5

The agentic SWE frontier — 82% SWE-bench Verified, Dev Team mode. vs Restricted-access flagship — vetted partners only.

Claude Sonnet 5 · context1M tokens
Claude Mythos 5 · context200K tokens
Claude Sonnet 5 · price$3 / $15 per M ($2/$10 intro)
Claude Mythos 5 · priceRestricted access — vetted partners only
Claude Sonnet 5 · vendorAnthropic
Claude Mythos 5 · vendorAnthropic

What I tested — same prompt, two models

I run the same fixed prompt set through every new model the day it drops — same string, one shot, single HTML file out — and I score the result 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. Below is what came out when I gave the exact same prompts to Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude Mythos 5, side by side, on 0 shared tasks inside the Agent Operating System.

Both models were given identical prompts inside the Agent Operating System — no help, no iteration, no "best of N" tricks. I run each prompt once, save the HTML file the model produces, and score it 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The scoring is mine. The verdicts below are pulled from my source comparison guides at agentos.guide where I publish every score and the reasoning behind it.

Claude Sonnet 5 · Reach for it in Agent OS when the job is iterative, tool-using software engineering. For one-shot visual builds, GLM 5.2 (free) beat it 4-1 here.

Claude Mythos 5 · Not currently dispatched from Agent OS — no public API. Tracked for news coverage only.

Side-by-side on 42 shared tasks

Click any cell to play that model's actual one-shot attempt. Medals are derived from my 0–10 scores per task (highest = 🥇, second = 🥈, third = 🥉).

Task ↓
Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Mythos 5
Game
Claude Sonnet 5 on Arcade
— not attempted —
Game
Claude Sonnet 5 on Crypt
— not attempted —
Game
Claude Sonnet 5 on Dogfight
— not attempted —
Game
Claude Sonnet 5 on Doom
— not attempted —
Claude Sonnet 5 on Dragonflight
— not attempted —
Claude Sonnet 5 on Dragonrealm
— not attempted —
Game
Claude Sonnet 5 on Game
— not attempted —
Claude Sonnet 5 on Neonblaster
— not attempted —
Game
Claude Sonnet 5 on Neoncity
— not attempted —
Game
🥈Claude Sonnet 5 on Neonracer
— not attempted —
Claude Sonnet 5 on Nordiccrypt
— not attempted —
Game
🥇Claude Sonnet 5 on Outrun
— not attempted —
Game
🥈Claude Sonnet 5 on Pool
— not attempted —
Game
Claude Sonnet 5 on Racing
— not attempted —
Game
Claude Sonnet 5 on Raycaster
— not attempted —
Game
Claude Sonnet 5 on Rpg
— not attempted —
Game
Claude Sonnet 5 on Skyrim
— not attempted —
Claude Sonnet 5 on Twilightvale
— not attempted —
Game
Claude Sonnet 5 on Voxelcraft
— not attempted —
Page
Claude Sonnet 5 on Landing
— not attempted —
Page
Claude Sonnet 5 on Webos
— not attempted —
Sim
Claude Sonnet 5 on Blackhole
— not attempted —
Sim
Claude Sonnet 5 on Boids
— not attempted —
Sim
Claude Sonnet 5 on Cloth
— not attempted —

Strengths & weaknesses I logged

Claude Sonnet 5

Strengths

  • 82.1% SWE-bench Verified — first model past 80% on real GitHub-issue repair
  • Dev Team multi-agent mode + 1M context for repo-level agentic work
  • Precision on hard logic — won the raycaster the open-weight field kept botching

Trade-offs

  • One-shot creative-visual builds trail GLM 5.2 here (lost 4 of 5) — no iteration to catch its own bugs
  • A temporal-dead-zone bug blanked its N-body orbit sim on the first shot

Claude Mythos 5

Strengths

  • Highest-class Anthropic model — sits above Fable 5 in the Mythos line
  • Same Mythos-class capability profile as Fable 5 (with restrictions)

Trade-offs

  • No public API access — can't be benched against the open field
  • Restricted distribution makes it effectively unavailable to most builders

Pricing & context — the spec sheet

Spec Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Mythos 5
VendorAnthropicAnthropic
Context window1,000,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Price$3 / $15 per M ($2/$10 intro)Restricted access — vetted partners only
Pricing detail$3.00 input / $15.00 output per million tokens; introductory $2.00/$10.00 through 2026-08-31.Mythos 5 is the un-released sibling of Fable 5. Same Mythos class, restricted to vetted partners. Made headlines mid-June 2026 when reports of a White-House-driven ban over China access dominated AI press.
Release2026-06-302026-06-09
Bench coverage42/42 scored · avg 7.18/100/0 scored · avg —

The verdict — which should you pick?

Not enough scored shared tasks yet for a head-to-head average. The live demos for both are on the matrix above — play them and form your own opinion.

If you only run one of these inside your stack, the head-to-head average above is the call. If you can run both, my honest play is to wire Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude Mythos 5 both into the Agent Operating System and dispatch each from the kanban by task type — agentic software engineering — write / run / test / fix loops on real repos → Claude Sonnet 5, vetted enterprise partners with mythos-class access → Claude Mythos 5. That's the same setup I run for the 3,600+ founders inside the AI Profit Boardroom.

FAQ — Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Mythos 5

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 5 or Claude Mythos 5?

On Goldie Bench, Claude Sonnet 5 averages no scored verdicts yet across the shared tasks, with 3 gold, 3 silver, 3 bronze overall. Claude Mythos 5 averages no scored verdicts yet, with 0 gold, 0 silver, 0 bronze. Not enough scored shared tasks yet to call a winner.

How much does Claude Sonnet 5 cost vs Claude Mythos 5?

Claude Sonnet 5: $3.00 input / $15.00 output per million tokens; introductory $2.00/$10.00 through 2026-08-31. Claude Mythos 5: Mythos 5 is the un-released sibling of Fable 5. Same Mythos class, restricted to vetted partners. Made headlines mid-June 2026 when reports of a White-House-driven ban over China access dominated AI press.

What's the context window for Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Mythos 5?

Claude Sonnet 5 has a 1,000,000 tokens context window. Claude Mythos 5 has a 200,000 tokens context window.

When should I pick Claude Sonnet 5 over Claude Mythos 5?

Pick Claude Sonnet 5 for: Agentic software engineering — write / run / test / fix loops on real repos; Repo-level reasoning across a 1M-token context (Dev Team multi-agent mode); Precise logic — raycasters, physics — where one-shot open models slip. The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: One-shot creative-visual builds trail GLM 5.2 here (lost 4 of 5) — no iteration to catch its own bugs; A temporal-dead-zone bug blanked its N-body orbit sim on the first shot.

When should I pick Claude Mythos 5 over Claude Sonnet 5?

Pick Claude Mythos 5 for: Vetted enterprise partners with Mythos-class access; (For everyone else: read the Mythos ban coverage instead of waiting for access). The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: No public API access — can't be benched against the open field; Restricted distribution makes it effectively unavailable to most builders.

How does Goldie Bench score Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Mythos 5?

Every demo on this page was built by Julian Goldie inside the Agent Operating System — same fixed prompt for both models, one shot, single HTML file out. Each result gets a 0–10 score on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The highest score on each task gets gold; second gets silver; third gets bronze. See methodology for full provenance.

The same stack Julian uses

Run this stack yourself.

Every demo on this bench was built inside the Agent Operating System — one prompt, one shot, single HTML file out. The Agent OS, the prompts, the templates, the weekly walkthroughs and 3,600+ founders shipping with it every day all live inside the AI Profit Boardroom.

3,600+founders
258documented wins
38countries
$59/momonthly