Flightsim

What I saw: One-shot: real aircraft model (wings/prop/gear) on runway w/ centerline + edge lights + tower, complete glass PFD (speed/alt tapes, pitch ladder, heading ribbon), autopilot demo rolls. Alt tape shows negative rows. Eyeballed.

What I saw: Polished flight sim with a detailed aircraft model, full HUD (airspeed/alt/VS/heading tape/attitude indicator), runway with markings, hangar, control tower and terrain — plus a combat layer with visible drones and cannon reticle. Very strong and shippable, but the enemy at this frame is just a single distant drone and it sits right at the top of the field's best rather than clearly beating it.

What I saw: SHOWCASE BUILD (threejs-game-director): livery aircraft w/ animated control surfaces + prop blur, real flight model (stall/ground effect/graded landings), canvas runway + PAPI + windsock airport, glass-cockpit strip (IAS/ALT tapes, horizon, heading), auto-demo. Eyeball-gate passed.

What I saw: Strong, cohesive flightsim: clean low-poly terrain with mountains/trees, full HUD (airspeed, altitude, VS, heading tape, artificial horizon, throttle), a visible aircraft on the runway, plus a combat/landing loop. No enemies visible in this frame and it's a mid-runway static shot, so it lands just short of the best but is clearly shippable.

What I saw: 66KB · plays clean · three, webgl

What I saw: Renders cleanly with a polished, cohesive HUD—airspeed/altitude tapes, compass, throttle, nav map, brackets and flight-path marker—and a believable runway-perspective terrain with a chase-cam aircraft, hitting all brief elements (takeoff, terrain, HUD, landing assist). Loses a touch versus the top field on visual richness (flat terrain, faint aircraft model) but it's strong and shippable.

What I saw: 9KB · plays clean · three, webgl, input, rAF

What I saw: One-shot score. The world is the best in the run, a low-poly valley with a river, hangar, control tower, marked runway and a sunset sky, plus a proper attitude ball and compass tape. The flight model was dead though: after nine seconds of throttle and five of back-pressure the HUD still read IAS 042KTS, ALT 0000FT, VS +000FPM, unchanged at every sample. Grok 4.6 fixed its own build from that evidence and the live demo now rotates and climbs to 992ft, though it still stalls if you over-pitch.

What I saw: Clean HUD with working attitude indicator, heading tape, throttle/gear/score panels, and a decently modeled aircraft with wings, nav lights and prop; but the terrain reads as an empty green haze with no visible runway, trees or structures from this altitude, leaving the world flat and generic compared to the field's best.

What I saw: HUD panel is polished and on-brand, but the screenshot shows a broken render — a giant close-up brown cross (the plane fills the frame) against a black void with no visible terrain, runway, sky, or clouds; the camera/scale is clearly wrong and the sim reads as non-functional.