Flightsim

What I saw: One-shot: real aircraft model (wings/prop/gear) on runway w/ centerline + edge lights + tower, complete glass PFD (speed/alt tapes, pitch ladder, heading ribbon), autopilot demo rolls. Alt tape shows negative rows. Eyeballed.

What I saw: Polished flight sim with a detailed aircraft model, full HUD (airspeed/alt/VS/heading tape/attitude indicator), runway with markings, hangar, control tower and terrain — plus a combat layer with visible drones and cannon reticle. Very strong and shippable, but the enemy at this frame is just a single distant drone and it sits right at the top of the field's best rather than clearly beating it.

What I saw: SHOWCASE BUILD (threejs-game-director): livery aircraft w/ animated control surfaces + prop blur, real flight model (stall/ground effect/graded landings), canvas runway + PAPI + windsock airport, glass-cockpit strip (IAS/ALT tapes, horizon, heading), auto-demo. Eyeball-gate passed.

What I saw: Strong, cohesive flightsim: clean low-poly terrain with mountains/trees, full HUD (airspeed, altitude, VS, heading tape, artificial horizon, throttle), a visible aircraft on the runway, plus a combat/landing loop. No enemies visible in this frame and it's a mid-runway static shot, so it lands just short of the best but is clearly shippable.

What I saw: 66KB · plays clean · three, webgl

What I saw: Renders cleanly with a polished, cohesive HUD—airspeed/altitude tapes, compass, throttle, nav map, brackets and flight-path marker—and a believable runway-perspective terrain with a chase-cam aircraft, hitting all brief elements (takeoff, terrain, HUD, landing assist). Loses a touch versus the top field on visual richness (flat terrain, faint aircraft model) but it's strong and shippable.

What I saw: 9KB · plays clean · three, webgl, input, rAF

What I saw: One-shot score. The world is the best in the run, a low-poly valley with a river, hangar, control tower, marked runway and a sunset sky, plus a proper attitude ball and compass tape. The flight model was dead though: after nine seconds of throttle and five of back-pressure the HUD still read IAS 042KTS, ALT 0000FT, VS +000FPM, unchanged at every sample. Grok 4.6 fixed its own build from that evidence and the live demo now rotates and climbs to 992ft, though it still stalls if you over-pitch.

What I saw: Strong render with a detailed 3D airport (runway, hangar, apron truck), clean chase-cam plane, and a rich professional HUD (heading tape, artificial horizon, IAS/ALT/VS gauges); playtest confirms real takeoff physics — throttle to 100, IAS ramping 55→146kt, ALT climbing 1→236m with VS +60 and heading changes. Minor nit: score stayed 00000 and no explicit landing was demonstrated, but the flight loop clearly works and looks great.

What I saw: Clean HUD with working attitude indicator, heading tape, throttle/gear/score panels, and a decently modeled aircraft with wings, nav lights and prop; but the terrain reads as an empty green haze with no visible runway, trees or structures from this altitude, leaving the world flat and generic compared to the field's best.