MiniMax M3 vs Fugu Ultra

What I tested — same prompt, two models

I run the same fixed prompt set through every new model the day it drops — same string, one shot, single HTML file out — and I score the result 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. Below is what came out when I gave the exact same prompts to MiniMax M3 and Fugu Ultra, side by side, on 42 shared tasks inside the Agent Operating System.

Both models were given identical prompts inside the Agent Operating System — no help, no iteration, no "best of N" tricks. I run each prompt once, save the HTML file the model produces, and score it 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The scoring is mine. The verdicts below are pulled from my source comparison guides at agentos.guide where I publish every score and the reasoning behind it.

MiniMax M3 · Bench prompts dispatched via OpenRouter. Scored by Claude judge against the same 42 prompts every other model ran.

Fugu Ultra · Dispatched from Agent OS as the panel-ensemble alternative to OpenRouter Fusion. Bench scored by Claude judge against the same 42 prompts as every other model.

Where MiniMax M3 beat Fugu Ultra

The tasks where I gave MiniMax M3 a higher 0–10 score on the same prompt — with the actual commentary from my source guides.

Where Fugu Ultra beat MiniMax M3

The tasks where I gave Fugu Ultra a higher 0–10 score on the same prompt — with the actual commentary from my source guides.

Strengths & weaknesses I logged

Pricing & context — the spec sheet

The verdict — which should you pick?

Across 42 scored shared tasks, the averages are essentially tied — MiniMax M3 7.96 vs Fugu Ultra 7.94. This isn't the comparison where one wins; it's the comparison where you pick based on context, pricing, and what you're actually trying to ship.

If you only run one of these inside your stack, the head-to-head average above is the call. If you can run both, my honest play is to wire MiniMax M3 and Fugu Ultra both into the Agent Operating System and dispatch each from the kanban by task type — high-volume agent workflows where per-call cost dominates → MiniMax M3, teams that want fusion-class quality but need a different vendor risk profile → Fugu Ultra. That's the same setup I run for the 4,000+ founders inside the AI Profit Boardroom.

FAQ — MiniMax M3 vs Fugu Ultra

Which is better, MiniMax M3 or Fugu Ultra?

On Goldie Bench, MiniMax M3 averages 7.96/10 across the shared tasks, with 2 gold, 1 silver, 4 bronze overall. Fugu Ultra averages 7.94/10, with 5 gold, 2 silver, 2 bronze. MiniMax M3 wins the head-to-head 17–15.

How much does MiniMax M3 cost vs Fugu Ultra?

MiniMax M3: MiniMax M3 is the cheapest 1M-context frontier model on the bench — roughly 1/200th the per-call cost of OpenRouter Fusion and 1/30th of Claude Opus 4.8. Designed for high-volume agent workloads where context length matters but per-call budget is tight. Fugu Ultra: Sakana's multi-agent orchestration: a single API call internally dispatches to multiple frontier models and synthesises the answer. Subscription plans run $20-$200/mo (Standard / Pro / Max); PAYG is $5/M input + $30/M output for Fugu Ultra. Direct competitor to OpenRouter Fusion's panel approach.

What's the context window for MiniMax M3 vs Fugu Ultra?

MiniMax M3 has a 1,048,576-token context — matches GLM-5.2 and Fable 5 context window. Fugu Ultra has a 272,000 tokens with the standard rate. Calls exceeding 272K context are billed at the higher 'long-context' rates. context window.

When should I pick MiniMax M3 over Fugu Ultra?

Pick MiniMax M3 for: High-volume agent workflows where per-call cost dominates; 1M-context tasks (whole-repo refactors, deep-research synthesis); Drop-in cheaper alternative to GLM-5.2 with comparable 1M context. The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: Less polished than Fusion's panel-ensembled output on the toughest deep builds; Newer model — less community calibration vs Fable 5 / Opus 4.8.

When should I pick Fugu Ultra over MiniMax M3?

Pick Fugu Ultra for: Teams that want Fusion-class quality but need a different vendor risk profile; Operators avoiding export-controlled providers (Sakana emphasises this in their pitch); Deep-research workflows where ensemble verdicts beat single-model answers. The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: Panel orchestration adds latency — even a 'pong' burns ~2k orchestration tokens; Newer than Fusion; less community calibration on long-tail prompts.

How does Goldie Bench score MiniMax M3 vs Fugu Ultra?

Every demo on this page was built by Julian Goldie inside the Agent Operating System — same fixed prompt for both models, one shot, single HTML file out. Each result gets a 0–10 score on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The highest score on each task gets gold; second gets silver; third gets bronze. See methodology for full provenance.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads using the same scoring system:

Full model pages: MiniMax M3 · Fugu Ultra · back to the leaderboard