
Real head-to-head · same prompt, one shot
Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.7 · Quality
Moonshot's 2.5T flagship — 1M context, tuned for long-horizon agent work. vs Quality mode — deepest thinking, best output.
What I tested — same prompt, two models
I run the same fixed prompt set through every new model the day it drops — same string, one shot, single HTML file out — and I score the result 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. Below is what came out when I gave the exact same prompts to Kimi K3 and Kimi K2.7 · Quality, side by side, on 47 shared tasks inside the Agent Operating System.
Both models were given identical prompts inside the Agent Operating System — no help, no iteration, no "best of N" tricks. I run each prompt once, save the HTML file the model produces, and score it 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The scoring is mine. The verdicts below are pulled from my source comparison guides at agentos.guide where I publish every score and the reasoning behind it.
Kimi K3 · Wired into the Agent OS as the `kimi-k3` Hermes profile and a K3 speed-toggle in the Kimi Code tab — used for long unattended agent runs where a slow-but-right model beats a fast-but-forgetful one.
Kimi K2.7 · Quality · Reserved for one-shot builds where the output is the deliverable — polish over speed.
Side-by-side on 50 shared tasks
Click any cell to play that model's actual one-shot attempt. Medals are derived from my 0–10 scores per task (highest = 🥇, second = 🥈, third = 🥉).
Task ↓
Kimi K3
Kimi K2.7 · Quality
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Game
Page
Strengths & weaknesses I logged
Kimi K3
Strengths
- Launch-day benchmarks put it around the Fable/Sol tier, with Terminal Bench (agentic terminal-driving) the standout
- 1M-token context verified on this bench's needle test: exact recall from 162k tokens of noise in 18s
- One-shot builds run long but land complete — its first bench game (13.4 min of thinking, 30,880 tokens) playtested with zero JS errors
- Included in the Kimi coding plan — frontier tier without a new bill
Trade-offs
- Slow on hard tasks — early testers report up to ~35 minutes at max reasoning; this bench saw 13+ minute single builds
- Launch-day rate limits on OpenRouter (429s) — the coding-plan endpoint was the reliable route
- Self-reports as K2.7 if you ask it — verify the served model via the API response, not the model's word
Kimi K2.7 · Quality
Strengths
- Highest-effort reasoning path of the three Kimi modes
- Hand-tuned output polish on creative tasks
- Same flat-rate plan as Fast and No-Think — no premium
Trade-offs
- Slower than Fast and No-Think — not for snappy loops
- Not scored on the standalone bench — see methodology
Pricing & context — the spec sheet
| Spec | Kimi K3 | Kimi K2.7 · Quality |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Moonshot AI | Moonshot AI |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens — a full codebase in working memory | 256,000 tokens |
| Price | $3 / M in | Flat plan (no per-token bill) |
| Pricing detail | Launched July 16, 2026. 2.5T-param MoE. $3/M input on OpenRouter at launch; included at no extra cost in the Kimi coding plan (`k3` on the coding endpoint). | Same flat-rate plan as standard Kimi K2.7 — Quality mode runs the deepest reasoning path. Vendor: Moonshot AI (moonshot.ai). |
| Release | 2026-07-16 | 2026-06 |
| Bench coverage | 50/50 scored · avg 5.81/10 | 0/47 scored · avg — |
The verdict — which should you pick?
Not enough scored shared tasks yet for a head-to-head average. The live demos for both are on the matrix above — play them and form your own opinion.
If you only run one of these inside your stack, the head-to-head average above is the call. If you can run both, my honest play is to wire Kimi K3 and Kimi K2.7 · Quality both into the Agent Operating System and dispatch each from the kanban by task type — long-horizon agent runs → Kimi K3, one-shot games and sims where polish matters → Kimi K2.7 · Quality. That's the same setup I run for the 4,000+ founders inside the AI Profit Boardroom.
FAQ — Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.7 · Quality
Which is better, Kimi K3 or Kimi K2.7 · Quality?
On Goldie Bench, Kimi K3 averages no scored verdicts yet across the shared tasks, with 9 gold, 5 silver, 7 bronze overall. Kimi K2.7 · Quality averages no scored verdicts yet, with 0 gold, 0 silver, 0 bronze. Not enough scored shared tasks yet to call a winner.
How much does Kimi K3 cost vs Kimi K2.7 · Quality?
Kimi K3: Launched July 16, 2026. 2.5T-param MoE. $3/M input on OpenRouter at launch; included at no extra cost in the Kimi coding plan (`k3` on the coding endpoint). Kimi K2.7 · Quality: Same flat-rate plan as standard Kimi K2.7 — Quality mode runs the deepest reasoning path. Vendor: Moonshot AI (moonshot.ai).
What's the context window for Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.7 · Quality?
Kimi K3 has a 1,048,576 tokens — a full codebase in working memory context window. Kimi K2.7 · Quality has a 256,000 tokens context window.
When should I pick Kimi K3 over Kimi K2.7 · Quality?
Pick Kimi K3 for: long-horizon agent runs; whole-repo context work; terminal-driving agents. The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: Slow on hard tasks — early testers report up to ~35 minutes at max reasoning; this bench saw 13+ minute single builds; Launch-day rate limits on OpenRouter (429s) — the coding-plan endpoint was the reliable route; Self-reports as K2.7 if you ask it — verify the served model via the API response, not the model's word.
When should I pick Kimi K2.7 · Quality over Kimi K3?
Pick Kimi K2.7 · Quality for: One-shot games and sims where polish matters; Creative writing where you want the model to slow down; Final-pass refinement of an earlier draft. The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: Slower than Fast and No-Think — not for snappy loops; Not scored on the standalone bench — see methodology.
How does Goldie Bench score Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.7 · Quality?
Every demo on this page was built by Julian Goldie inside the Agent Operating System — same fixed prompt for both models, one shot, single HTML file out. Each result gets a 0–10 score on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The highest score on each task gets gold; second gets silver; third gets bronze. See methodology for full provenance.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads using the same scoring system:
Kimi K3 vs Fusion Kimi K2.7 · Quality vs Fusion Kimi K3 vs Hermes MoA Kimi K2.7 · Quality vs Hermes MoA Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol Kimi K2.7 · Quality vs GPT-5.6 Sol Kimi K3 vs Claude Fable 5 Kimi K2.7 · Quality vs Claude Fable 5Full model pages: Kimi K3 · Kimi K2.7 · Quality · back to the leaderboard
The same stack Julian uses
Run this stack yourself.
Every demo on this bench was built inside the Agent Operating System — one prompt, one shot, single HTML file out. The Agent OS, the prompts, the templates, the weekly walkthroughs and 4,000+ founders shipping with it every day all live inside the AI Profit Boardroom.
4,000+founders
258documented wins
38countries
$59/momonthly














































