Real head-to-head · same prompt, one shot

Kimi K2.7 vs Claude Mythos 5

The heavy lifter — frontier coder at flat-rate. vs Restricted-access flagship — vetted partners only.

Kimi K2.7 · context256K tokens
Claude Mythos 5 · context200K tokens
Kimi K2.7 · priceFlat plan (no per-token bill)
Claude Mythos 5 · priceRestricted access — vetted partners only
Kimi K2.7 · vendorMoonshot AI
Claude Mythos 5 · vendorAnthropic

What I tested — same prompt, two models

I run the same fixed prompt set through every new model the day it drops — same string, one shot, single HTML file out — and I score the result 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. Below is what came out when I gave the exact same prompts to Kimi K2.7 and Claude Mythos 5, side by side, on 0 shared tasks inside the Agent Operating System.

Both models were given identical prompts inside the Agent Operating System — no help, no iteration, no "best of N" tricks. I run each prompt once, save the HTML file the model produces, and score it 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The scoring is mine. The verdicts below are pulled from my source comparison guides at agentos.guide where I publish every score and the reasoning behind it.

Kimi K2.7 · Wired into the Agent OS as the heavy-lifter for game/sim prototypes and Kanban-dispatched code work. Mode toggled per task: Quality for one-shot games, Fast for short bursts.

Claude Mythos 5 · Not currently dispatched from Agent OS — no public API. Tracked for news coverage only.

Side-by-side on 23 shared tasks

Click any cell to play that model's actual one-shot attempt. Medals are derived from my 0–10 scores per task (highest = 🥇, second = 🥈, third = 🥉).

Task ↓
Kimi K2.7
Claude Mythos 5
Game
🥈Kimi K2.7 on Arcade
— not attempted —
Game
🥇Kimi K2.7 on Doom
— not attempted —
Game
🥉Kimi K2.7 on Neoncity
— not attempted —
Game
🥉Kimi K2.7 on Outrun
— not attempted —
Game
🥇Kimi K2.7 on Raycaster
— not attempted —
Page
Kimi K2.7 on Landing
— not attempted —
Sim
Kimi K2.7 on Blackhole
— not attempted —
Sim
Kimi K2.7 on Boids
— not attempted —
Sim
Kimi K2.7 on Fluid
— not attempted —
Sim
🥇Kimi K2.7 on Fractal
— not attempted —
Sim
🥈Kimi K2.7 on Galaxy
— not attempted —
Sim
Kimi K2.7 on Orbit
— not attempted —
— not attempted —
Sim
🥉Kimi K2.7 on Solar
— not attempted —
Sim
Kimi K2.7 on Wormhole
— not attempted —
Visual
Kimi K2.7 on Aurora
— not attempted —
Visual
Kimi K2.7 on Fireworks
— not attempted —
Visual
Kimi K2.7 on Lavalamp
— not attempted —
Visual
Kimi K2.7 on Matrix
— not attempted —
Visual
Kimi K2.7 on Synthwave
— not attempted —
Visual
Kimi K2.7 on Terrain
— not attempted —
Visual
Kimi K2.7 on Voxel
— not attempted —
Visual
Kimi K2.7 on Waves
— not attempted —

Strengths & weaknesses I logged

Kimi K2.7

Strengths

  • Best-of-three on interactive games — raycaster, DOOM, monster AI
  • Three speed modes (Fast / No-Think / Quality) you can swap per task
  • Flat-rate plan eliminates the per-token meter, so iteration is free

Trade-offs

  • Plays plainest on abstract visual prompts — synthwave grids, fluid sims, aurora — where GLM and Opus add more flair
  • Bronze average on the Goldie Bench bench despite the gold-medal games — its visual builds are accurate but understated

Claude Mythos 5

Strengths

  • Highest-class Anthropic model — sits above Fable 5 in the Mythos line
  • Same Mythos-class capability profile as Fable 5 (with restrictions)

Trade-offs

  • No public API access — can't be benched against the open field
  • Restricted distribution makes it effectively unavailable to most builders

Pricing & context — the spec sheet

Spec Kimi K2.7 Claude Mythos 5
VendorMoonshot AIAnthropic
Context window256,000 tokens200,000 tokens
PriceFlat plan (no per-token bill)Restricted access — vetted partners only
Pricing detailAvailable on Moonshot's flat-rate subscription plan — no per-token billing for individual builders. The plan covers all three speed modes (Fast, No-Think, Quality).Mythos 5 is the un-released sibling of Fable 5. Same Mythos class, restricted to vetted partners. Made headlines mid-June 2026 when reports of a White-House-driven ban over China access dominated AI press.
Release2026-062026-06-09
Bench coverage14/23 scored · avg 7.25/100/0 scored · avg —

The verdict — which should you pick?

Not enough scored shared tasks yet for a head-to-head average. The live demos for both are on the matrix above — play them and form your own opinion.

If you only run one of these inside your stack, the head-to-head average above is the call. If you can run both, my honest play is to wire Kimi K2.7 and Claude Mythos 5 both into the Agent Operating System and dispatch each from the kanban by task type — interactive game prototypes you want shippable on the first prompt → Kimi K2.7, vetted enterprise partners with mythos-class access → Claude Mythos 5. That's the same setup I run for the 3,600+ founders inside the AI Profit Boardroom.

FAQ — Kimi K2.7 vs Claude Mythos 5

Which is better, Kimi K2.7 or Claude Mythos 5?

On Goldie Bench, Kimi K2.7 averages no scored verdicts yet across the shared tasks, with 3 gold, 2 silver, 3 bronze overall. Claude Mythos 5 averages no scored verdicts yet, with 0 gold, 0 silver, 0 bronze. Not enough scored shared tasks yet to call a winner.

How much does Kimi K2.7 cost vs Claude Mythos 5?

Kimi K2.7: Available on Moonshot's flat-rate subscription plan — no per-token billing for individual builders. The plan covers all three speed modes (Fast, No-Think, Quality). Claude Mythos 5: Mythos 5 is the un-released sibling of Fable 5. Same Mythos class, restricted to vetted partners. Made headlines mid-June 2026 when reports of a White-House-driven ban over China access dominated AI press.

What's the context window for Kimi K2.7 vs Claude Mythos 5?

Kimi K2.7 has a 256,000 tokens context window. Claude Mythos 5 has a 200,000 tokens context window.

When should I pick Kimi K2.7 over Claude Mythos 5?

Pick Kimi K2.7 for: Interactive game prototypes you want shippable on the first prompt; High-iteration agent loops where per-token cost would dominate; Long-context refactors using the 256K window inside Agent OS. The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: Plays plainest on abstract visual prompts — synthwave grids, fluid sims, aurora — where GLM and Opus add more flair; Bronze average on the {{SITE_NAME}} bench despite the gold-medal games — its visual builds are accurate but understated.

When should I pick Claude Mythos 5 over Kimi K2.7?

Pick Claude Mythos 5 for: Vetted enterprise partners with Mythos-class access; (For everyone else: read the Mythos ban coverage instead of waiting for access). The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: No public API access — can't be benched against the open field; Restricted distribution makes it effectively unavailable to most builders.

How does Goldie Bench score Kimi K2.7 vs Claude Mythos 5?

Every demo on this page was built by Julian Goldie inside the Agent Operating System — same fixed prompt for both models, one shot, single HTML file out. Each result gets a 0–10 score on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The highest score on each task gets gold; second gets silver; third gets bronze. See methodology for full provenance.

The same stack Julian uses

Run this stack yourself.

Every demo on this bench was built inside the Agent Operating System — one prompt, one shot, single HTML file out. The Agent OS, the prompts, the templates, the weekly walkthroughs and 3,600+ founders shipping with it every day all live inside the AI Profit Boardroom.

3,600+founders
258documented wins
38countries
$100k+/mocommunity MRR