Fugu Ultra 1.1 vs Kimi K2.7 · No-Think

What I tested — same prompt, two models

I run the same fixed prompt set through every new model the day it drops — same string, one shot, single HTML file out — and I score the result 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. Below is what came out when I gave the exact same prompts to Fugu Ultra 1.1 and Kimi K2.7 · No-Think, side by side, on 1 shared tasks inside the Agent Operating System.

Both models were given identical prompts inside the Agent Operating System — no help, no iteration, no "best of N" tricks. I run each prompt once, save the HTML file the model produces, and score it 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The scoring is mine. The verdicts below are pulled from my source comparison guides at agentos.guide where I publish every score and the reasoning behind it.

Fugu Ultra 1.1 · Benched on GoldieBench via Sakana's Responses API (fugu-ultra-v1.1, xhigh reasoning). Game tasks use the skill-infused threejs-game-director prompt plus a controls+graphics fix loop with an anti-regression clamp, judged on a real mid-play frame by the same Opus judge as the field.

Kimi K2.7 · No-Think · Reserved for templated transforms where the plan is already in the prompt — the model just executes.

Strengths & weaknesses I logged

Pricing & context — the spec sheet

The verdict — which should you pick?

Not enough scored shared tasks yet for a head-to-head average. The live demos for both are on the matrix above — play them and form your own opinion.

If you only run one of these inside your stack, the head-to-head average above is the call. If you can run both, my honest play is to wire Fugu Ultra 1.1 and Kimi K2.7 · No-Think both into the Agent Operating System and dispatch each from the kanban by task type — hard, high-stakes coding and reasoning where answer quality beats latency → Fugu Ultra 1.1, templated transforms where the plan is in the prompt → Kimi K2.7 · No-Think. That's the same setup I run for the 4,000+ founders inside the AI Profit Boardroom.

FAQ — Fugu Ultra 1.1 vs Kimi K2.7 · No-Think

Which is better, Fugu Ultra 1.1 or Kimi K2.7 · No-Think?

On Goldie Bench, Fugu Ultra 1.1 averages no scored verdicts yet across the shared tasks, with 0 gold, 0 silver, 1 bronze overall. Kimi K2.7 · No-Think averages no scored verdicts yet, with 0 gold, 0 silver, 0 bronze. Not enough scored shared tasks yet to call a winner.

How much does Fugu Ultra 1.1 cost vs Kimi K2.7 · No-Think?

Fugu Ultra 1.1: Sakana's Fugu Ultra v1.1 — a multi-agent system served as a model: an orchestrator routes each request across one to three expert agents and synthesises the answer. Reported (v1.0): SWE-Bench Pro 73.7, LiveCodeBench 93.2, GPQA Diamond 95.5. NOTE: Sakana geo-blocks the EU/EEA/UK/Switzerland pending GDPR compliance — benched from an allowed region. Kimi K2.7 · No-Think: Same flat-rate plan as standard Kimi K2.7 — No-Think disables the chain-of-thought layer at runtime. Vendor: Moonshot AI (moonshot.ai).

What's the context window for Fugu Ultra 1.1 vs Kimi K2.7 · No-Think?

Fugu Ultra 1.1 has a 1,000,000-token context window context window. Kimi K2.7 · No-Think has a 256,000 tokens context window.

When should I pick Fugu Ultra 1.1 over Kimi K2.7 · No-Think?

Pick Fugu Ultra 1.1 for: Hard, high-stakes coding and reasoning where answer quality beats latency; Agentic workflows in Codex / Claude Code via the drop-in provider config; One-shot builds you want a panel of experts on, not a single model. The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: Benched as a partial run until the full 50-task batch completes; Region-locked: unavailable across the EU/EEA/UK/CH — access depends on where you are.

When should I pick Kimi K2.7 · No-Think over Fugu Ultra 1.1?

Pick Kimi K2.7 · No-Think for: Templated transforms where the plan is in the prompt; Batched code generation jobs; Workflows where you want the model to stop second-guessing. The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: Loses ground on multi-step tasks that benefit from planning; Not scored on the standalone bench — see methodology.

How does Goldie Bench score Fugu Ultra 1.1 vs Kimi K2.7 · No-Think?

Every demo on this page was built by Julian Goldie inside the Agent Operating System — same fixed prompt for both models, one shot, single HTML file out. Each result gets a 0–10 score on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The highest score on each task gets gold; second gets silver; third gets bronze. See methodology for full provenance.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads using the same scoring system:

Full model pages: Fugu Ultra 1.1 · Kimi K2.7 · No-Think · back to the leaderboard