Real head-to-head · same prompt, one shot

Gemma-4 12B Coder vs Claude Mythos 5

The free, offline coder — trained only on code that passed its tests. vs Restricted-access flagship — vetted partners only.

Gemma-4 12B Coder · context256K tokens
Claude Mythos 5 · context200K tokens
Gemma-4 12B Coder · priceFree · runs locally
Claude Mythos 5 · priceRestricted access — vetted partners only
Gemma-4 12B Coder · vendorCommunity (Gemma-4 · local)
Claude Mythos 5 · vendorAnthropic

What I tested — same prompt, two models

I run the same fixed prompt set through every new model the day it drops — same string, one shot, single HTML file out — and I score the result 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. Below is what came out when I gave the exact same prompts to Gemma-4 12B Coder and Claude Mythos 5, side by side, on 0 shared tasks inside the Agent Operating System.

Both models were given identical prompts inside the Agent Operating System — no help, no iteration, no "best of N" tricks. I run each prompt once, save the HTML file the model produces, and score it 0–10 on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The scoring is mine. The verdicts below are pulled from my source comparison guides at agentos.guide where I publish every score and the reasoning behind it.

Gemma-4 12B Coder · Wired into the Agent OS local engine (Local chat + Local Hermes Engine + Agent Kanban) as the free, offline coder. Scored by Claude judge against the same one-shot prompts every other model ran.

Claude Mythos 5 · Not currently dispatched from Agent OS — no public API. Tracked for news coverage only.

Side-by-side on 6 shared tasks

Click any cell to play that model's actual one-shot attempt. Medals are derived from my 0–10 scores per task (highest = 🥇, second = 🥈, third = 🥉).

Task ↓
Gemma-4 12B Coder
Claude Mythos 5
Game
Gemma-4 12B Coder on Arcade
— not attempted —
Page
Gemma-4 12B Coder on Landing
— not attempted —
Sim
Gemma-4 12B Coder on Galaxy
— not attempted —
Sim
Gemma-4 12B Coder on Solar
— not attempted —
Visual
Gemma-4 12B Coder on Matrix
— not attempted —
Visual
Gemma-4 12B Coder on Plasma
— not attempted —

Strengths & weaknesses I logged

Gemma-4 12B Coder

Strengths

  • Runs 100% free + offline on a consumer Mac (Q4_K_M, 7.4GB) — no API, no rate limits, nothing leaves the machine
  • Test-verified training (Composer 2.5 + Fable 5) — shipped a clean SaaS landing page and a working particle galaxy one-shot
  • Fast on Apple Silicon — 2.4s cold start, ~35 tokens/sec on an M4 Max

Trade-offs

  • Half its one-shots shipped broken on the bench — a missing canvas append, a missing render loop, and an uncompiled WebGL shader
  • Far below frontier models on complex 3D / WebGL / games — strongest on pages and simple canvas work, not simulations

Claude Mythos 5

Strengths

  • Highest-class Anthropic model — sits above Fable 5 in the Mythos line
  • Same Mythos-class capability profile as Fable 5 (with restrictions)

Trade-offs

  • No public API access — can't be benched against the open field
  • Restricted distribution makes it effectively unavailable to most builders

Pricing & context — the spec sheet

Spec Gemma-4 12B Coder Claude Mythos 5
VendorCommunity (Gemma-4 · local)Anthropic
Context window256,000 tokens200,000 tokens
PriceFree · runs locallyRestricted access — vetted partners only
Pricing detailA community fine-tune of Google's Gemma-4 12B (xentriom/gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1), Apache-2.0. Free to download and run 100% offline on your own Mac via Ollama — no API, no per-token bill. The Q4_K_M build is 7.4GB.Mythos 5 is the un-released sibling of Fable 5. Same Mythos class, restricted to vetted partners. Made headlines mid-June 2026 when reports of a White-House-driven ban over China access dominated AI press.
Release2026-062026-06-09
Bench coverage6/6 scored · avg 4.25/100/0 scored · avg —

The verdict — which should you pick?

Not enough scored shared tasks yet for a head-to-head average. The live demos for both are on the matrix above — play them and form your own opinion.

If you only run one of these inside your stack, the head-to-head average above is the call. If you can run both, my honest play is to wire Gemma-4 12B Coder and Claude Mythos 5 both into the Agent Operating System and dispatch each from the kanban by task type — free, private, offline coding where nothing can leave your machine → Gemma-4 12B Coder, vetted enterprise partners with mythos-class access → Claude Mythos 5. That's the same setup I run for the 3,600+ founders inside the AI Profit Boardroom.

FAQ — Gemma-4 12B Coder vs Claude Mythos 5

Which is better, Gemma-4 12B Coder or Claude Mythos 5?

On Goldie Bench, Gemma-4 12B Coder averages no scored verdicts yet across the shared tasks, with 0 gold, 0 silver, 0 bronze overall. Claude Mythos 5 averages no scored verdicts yet, with 0 gold, 0 silver, 0 bronze. Not enough scored shared tasks yet to call a winner.

How much does Gemma-4 12B Coder cost vs Claude Mythos 5?

Gemma-4 12B Coder: A community fine-tune of Google's Gemma-4 12B (xentriom/gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1), Apache-2.0. Free to download and run 100% offline on your own Mac via Ollama — no API, no per-token bill. The Q4_K_M build is 7.4GB. Claude Mythos 5: Mythos 5 is the un-released sibling of Fable 5. Same Mythos class, restricted to vetted partners. Made headlines mid-June 2026 when reports of a White-House-driven ban over China access dominated AI press.

What's the context window for Gemma-4 12B Coder vs Claude Mythos 5?

Gemma-4 12B Coder has a 256,000 tokens context window. Claude Mythos 5 has a 200,000 tokens context window.

When should I pick Gemma-4 12B Coder over Claude Mythos 5?

Pick Gemma-4 12B Coder for: Free, private, offline coding where nothing can leave your machine; Landing pages, simple canvas builds, and code you'll review before shipping; Anyone who wants a $0 local coder wired into their Agent OS. The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: Half its one-shots shipped broken on the bench — a missing canvas append, a missing render loop, and an uncompiled WebGL shader; Far below frontier models on complex 3D / WebGL / games — strongest on pages and simple canvas work, not simulations.

When should I pick Claude Mythos 5 over Gemma-4 12B Coder?

Pick Claude Mythos 5 for: Vetted enterprise partners with Mythos-class access; (For everyone else: read the Mythos ban coverage instead of waiting for access). The trade-off is the weaknesses we logged on the bench: No public API access — can't be benched against the open field; Restricted distribution makes it effectively unavailable to most builders.

How does Goldie Bench score Gemma-4 12B Coder vs Claude Mythos 5?

Every demo on this page was built by Julian Goldie inside the Agent Operating System — same fixed prompt for both models, one shot, single HTML file out. Each result gets a 0–10 score on whether it ran, how close it hit the brief, and how good it looked. The highest score on each task gets gold; second gets silver; third gets bronze. See methodology for full provenance.

The same stack Julian uses

Run this stack yourself.

Every demo on this bench was built inside the Agent Operating System — one prompt, one shot, single HTML file out. The Agent OS, the prompts, the templates, the weekly walkthroughs and 3,600+ founders shipping with it every day all live inside the AI Profit Boardroom.

3,600+founders
258documented wins
38countries
$100k+/mocommunity MRR