GoldieBench Blog · 6 min read
Grok Bot For Marketing + Which AI Models Fit Landing Pages, Motion Ads And Reports, With Real GoldieBench Scores
Grok Bot picks its own model, so these live bench scores are for the page and ad builds around it. Read on 5 November 2026, each with its source page.

Grok bot for marketing picks its own model for every task, so GoldieBench scores help you choose the models you pair with it for pages and ads, not the one inside it.
Every score below was read on the live goldiebench.com pages on 5 November 2026 and is quoted with the page it sits on.
The marketing facts come from the official Grok Bot use cases page and the Grok Bot changelog.
Need help choosing models for each channel? Grab a free SEO strategy session with my team and we will map it out.
Read the scores as a guide to builds you run yourself, and leave the Bot to choose its own model for research and reports.
Why no score tells you what runs inside Grok Bot
The Grok Bot FAQ says there is no model picker: the Bot chooses a backend model per task and does not show which one it used.
So a GoldieBench score for Grok rates xAI's chat model, not Grok Bot.
Where scores do help is the work around the Bot: the landing page, the motion ad, the copy you write in another tool.
xAI documents a Paid media role for Grok Bot, but no bench task measures campaign analysis, so no score here should steer that choice.
The live leaderboard numbers that matter here
| Model | Avg / 10 | Tasks | Page read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fusion | 8.59 | 47 | /models/ |
| Claude Opus 5 | 8.27 | 50 | /models/ |
| Hermes MoA | 8.17 | 47 | /models/ |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 8.16 | 50 | /models/ |
| Claude Fable 5 | 8.10 | 47 | /models/ |
| Qwen 3.8 | 8.10 | 45 | /models/ |
| Grok | 8.09 | 47 | /models/grok |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 7.57 | 50 | /models/ |
| Grok 4.7 | 7.15 | 20 | /models/grok47 |
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | 7.08 | 50 | /models/ |
The /models/ page describes the method: the same fixed prompts for every model, one shot each, scored 0 to 10.
These are creative coding builds, so read them as a guide to page and ad builds, not to campaign analysis.
Two rows stand out for xAI fans: Grok at 8.09 over 47 tasks, and the newer Grok 4.7 at 7.15 over only 20 tasks.
The smaller task count on Grok 4.7 means its average rests on less evidence, so do not read the gap as settled.
Claude Opus 5.5 sits at 7.57 over 50 tasks, below Claude Opus 5 at 8.27 on the same page.
Landing pages: the closest bench task to marketing
The /tasks/landing task asks for a modern marketing landing page in one shot.
The page reads 26 models tested, 21 of 26 scored, an average of 8.11/10, and Fugu Ultra as the winner.
| Model | Landing score | Page read |
|---|---|---|
| Fugu Ultra | 9.0 (winner) | /tasks/landing |
| Fusion | 9.0 | /tasks/landing |
| GLM-5.2 | 9.0 | /tasks/landing |
| Grok | 9.0 | /tasks/landing |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 8.7 | /tasks/landing |
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | 8.6 | /tasks/landing |
| Claude Fable 5 | 7.2 | /tasks/landing |
Grok ties the top score here at 9.0, which makes it a sensible model to draft a campaign page with in your own build tool.
Claude Fable 5 sits at 7.2 on this task, below its 8.10 leaderboard average.
Motion ads: where Grok Bot's video tool stops
The files and results docs say Grok Bot clips run 1 to 15 seconds, look filmed, and are not made for motion graphics, title cards or exact text.
For a text-heavy motion ad, the /tasks/aipbpromo task is the nearest test: a cinematic motion-graphics video advert with animated stats and an end call to action.
That page lists 26 models tested, 20 of 26 scored, an average of 7.48/10 and Qwen 3.8 as the winner.
| Model | Video advert score | Page read |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 8.3 | /tasks/aipbpromo |
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | 7.8 | /tasks/aipbpromo |
| Claude Fable 5 | 7.5 | /tasks/aipbpromo |
| Fusion | 7.5 | /tasks/aipbpromo |
| GLM-5.2 | 7.5 | /tasks/aipbpromo |
| Grok | 7.0 | /tasks/aipbpromo |
GPT-5.6 Sol leads the six rows read here at 8.3, and Grok scores 7.0, so for a coded motion ad the bench points away from Grok.
A conflict on the Grok page you should know about
The Grok model page shows an 8.09/10 average over 47 tasks tested and says 43 are scored against the field.
The same page lists a trade-off calling Grok currently unranked with zero curated verdicts on 13 demos.
Both lines are live at once, so treat the Grok average as provisional until the page settles.
Its strengths list highlights real-time access to X timeline data, which matches the X research Grok Bot does natively.
What Grok Bot handles without any model choice
- The Paid media role: campaign monitoring and budget recommendations, stopping before budgets change or messages go out.
- Ad connectors: since V0.78.1, a Bot that reaches a TikTok for Business, Meta Ads or Google Ads login offers to connect the app instead.
- X research: public posts, mentions, trends and news are searchable with no X API credits, per the troubleshooting docs.
- Tagging @bot under an X post hands it to your Bot, outside the UK, EU, Australia, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway, per the @bot docs.
- Reports as Pages with tables, charts and filters, refreshed by a weekly routine.
- Figma, Canva and Notion cards in chat since V0.70.2.
- Approvals: publishing content and purchases sit on the approvals docs list of actions to keep behind a boundary.
Shop example: a sale page plus the weekly ads check
- Grok Bot runs the Paid media check every Monday and updates a Page with campaign tables.
- The owner builds the sale landing page in their own tool with a model that scored 9.0 on /tasks/landing, such as Grok or Fusion.
- The Bot drafts the launch posts in a doc; publishing waits for the owner.
Salon example: filmed clip from the Bot, text ad from a model
- Grok Bot makes a 6-second 9:16 clip of a calm salon chair, with no text in it.
- For a version with the offer in animated text, the owner uses a model strong on /tasks/aipbpromo, such as GPT-5.6 Sol at 8.3.
- The owner posts the finished ad; the Bot never publishes it.
Agency and coach examples: no model pick needed
- An agency gives each client a Paid media Bot and shares the weekly Page with the client team once reviewed.
- Its campaign analysis runs on whatever model Grok Bot picks, so the bench plays no part there.
- A coach asks the Bot to search public X each weekday for audience questions and log them in a tracker Page.
- The coach drafts answers in their usual writing model and posts them by hand.
How to read these scores for marketing
Use the landing and video advert tasks to pick the model for page and ad builds you make yourself.
Leave analysis, research and reporting to Grok Bot, whose model you cannot pick anyway.
Check every number a Bot or a model hands you against its source before you act on it.
For a wider list of jobs, see the Grok Bot ideas guide on this site.
And if you want trainings on wiring models into a marketing stack, the AI Profit Boardroom covers it in its weekly calls.
Also On Our Network
- Agent Operatorsthe seven-step build for a paid media Bot with approvals first
- AI Income Deskwhether a small business owner should hand marketing prep to a Bot
- AI Tool Verdicta ten-job scorecard rating the Bot for marketing work
- agentos.guidefive Agent OS prompts that brief a marketing Bot and its weekly report
- aiprofitboardroom.comthe complete Grok Bot for marketing guide on the AI Profit Boardroom blog
Pick bench-scored models for the pages and ads you build, leave research and reports to the Bot, and book a free strategy session to plan grok bot for marketing.
FAQ
Which model does Grok Bot use for marketing tasks?
It picks one per task and does not show which. There is no model picker, so benchmark scores do not describe Grok Bot itself.
Which models scored highest on the GoldieBench landing page task?
Fugu Ultra, Fusion, GLM-5.2 and Grok each scored 9.0 on /tasks/landing, with Fugu Ultra listed as the winner.
Can Grok Bot make a motion-graphics ad?
Its video tool makes filmed-looking clips of 1 to 15 seconds and is not meant for motion graphics or exact text. For a coded motion ad, GPT-5.6 Sol scored 8.3 on /tasks/aipbpromo.
Is the Grok score on GoldieBench final?
Treat it as provisional. The Grok page shows an 8.09 average but also a trade-off line saying it is currently unranked.


