⭐ Get the Agent OS + join 3,400+ founders inside the AI Profit Boardroom → Join AIPB

GoldieBench Blog · 6 min read

GEO Agency UK Work: Which AI Models Help Draft Pages, Schema And Briefs, Using Real GoldieBench Scores

GoldieBench has no SEO task, so the Pages scores are the closest guide to which models draft GEO landing pages well; everything else needs a person.

Illustrated leaderboard of glowing gold bars beside a landing page wireframe and a citation bubble on a dark navy background

A GEO agency UK businesses hire will lean on AI models to draft landing pages, schema and briefs, so it helps to know which models build pages well and which tasks still need a person.

GEO, generative engine optimisation, is the work of being cited when AI search tools answer a question, and the models you use only cover part of it.

Every score on this page I read on live GoldieBench pages on 11 November 2026, and each one names its page.

Want a human view of your site too? Book a free strategy session with Goldie Agency.

What GoldieBench measures, and what it doesn't

The GoldieBench home page lists 1310 live demos, 50 tasks and 33 models, with every model given the same one-shot prompt and scored out of 10.

Its task categories are Games, Visuals, Sims and Pages.

There is no SEO writing task, no schema task and no citation test on the bench.

So the Pages category, and the Landing task in particular, is the closest proxy for GEO work: building a clear, well-structured page a person can then fill with first-hand content.

The Landing task scores that matter for GEO pages

The Landing task page asks for a modern marketing landing page in one shot, and shows an average of 8.11/10 across 21 scored attempts.

These are the scores I read there:

ModelLanding scorePage read
Fugu Ultra (Sakana AI)9.0/10/tasks/landing
Fusion (OpenRouter)9.0/10/tasks/landing
GLM-5.2 (Zhipu / Z.ai)9.0/10/tasks/landing
Grok (xAI)9.0/10/tasks/landing
GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI)8.7/10/tasks/landing
Gemini 3.6 Flash (Google)8.6/10/tasks/landing
Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic)7.2/10/tasks/landing

A 9.0 here means a polished page layout, not a page that will be cited.

Citations depend on what's written on the page and on what the wider web says about you.

The wider Pages picture

The Webos task page is another Pages test, with an average of 7.98/10; Fusion and Grok both scored 9.0/10 there, and GPT-5.6 Sol scored 8.4/10.

On the overall leaderboard on the home page, Fusion leads at 8.59, Claude Opus 5 is second at 8.27 and GPT-5.6 Sol is fourth at 8.16, with GPT-5.6 Sol and Gemini 3.6 Flash each tagged best at Pages.

Read together, Fusion, Grok and GPT-5.6 Sol look like steady picks for page drafts, and the Landing 9.0 group gives you several options if one is unavailable.

Matching models to the GEO tasks they can draft

GEO taskModel help?What GoldieBench tells you
Service or location landing page layoutYes, draftLanding scores above are the closest proxy
Organization or LocalBusiness JSON-LDYes, draftNot tested on the bench; check output against Google docs
Content brief from customer questionsYes, draftNot tested; judge on your own data
First-hand experience and photosNoHas to come from the business
Earning mentions and linksResearch onlyOutreach and relationships need people

Whatever model drafts it, Google's guidance is the yardstick for what the page needs.

What the platforms say the page needs

Google's guide to generative AI search says optimising for AI features is still SEO, and asks for non-commodity, people-first content.

It also says structured data isn't required for AI features and that Search doesn't use llms.txt.

Its AI features page says a page must be indexed and eligible for a snippet to appear in AI Overviews or AI Mode.

Bing's Webmaster Guidelines ask for consistent entity names and one topic per URL.

A model can lay those pages out well, but the facts, the experience and the local detail come from you.

The access checks no model score fixes

A perfect page is invisible if the AI search bots can't reach it.

OpenAI's crawler docs say sites that block OAI-SearchBot won't appear in ChatGPT search answers.

Perplexity's crawler page recommends allowing PerplexityBot to appear in its results.

Anthropic's crawler page says blocking Claude-SearchBot may reduce visibility in Claude's search results.

Check robots.txt and your CDN rules before you spend time choosing a model.

The UK details a model won't know

UK shops and restaurants hit a wall in ChatGPT's Business Hub: OpenAI's help page (Nov 2026) only lets local businesses of that kind claim a listing that already exists in the US.

For measurement, Google's generative AI performance reports include a countries view, so you can isolate UK impressions.

And no model, tool or agency can guarantee a citation: Google, Bing and OpenAI all say placement isn't guaranteed.

How to test a model on your own GEO page

  1. Pick one real service page that already gets impressions in Search Console's generative AI report.
  2. Give two or three high-scoring Landing models the same brief: your facts, your customer questions and your UK details.
  3. Compare the drafts for structure, clarity and whether they invent anything; reject any draft that adds a fact you didn't supply.
  4. Have a person add the first-hand detail, photos and examples only your business has.
  5. Publish one, then watch the generative AI report and Bing's AI Performance citations for that URL over the following weeks.

That keeps the model choice tied to your own pages rather than to a leaderboard alone.

Model drafting gotchas for GEO pages

  • Models love generic copy; Google's guide calls that commodity content and asks for a unique point of view instead.
  • Models may invent statistics or reviews, which you must strip out before anything goes live.
  • A model-written JSON-LD block can drift from the visible page text, which Google says it should match.
  • A model can't check robots.txt on your live server unless you give it the file, so run the access check with an agent or by hand; the AI Profit Boardroom trainings cover both routes.

Where the human and agency part comes in

Models cover drafting; people cover strategy, proof, outreach and judgement.

Julian Goldie's agency, Goldie Agency, covers SEO, GEO, AEO and link building with manual outreach and no PBNs, serving UK clients remotely.

Self-reported figures on Julian's about page put the campaign count at 1,000+ and his YouTube audience at 425K+ subscribers.

For the human part of your plan, Book a free SEO strategy session.

To run the model side yourself, learn AI SEO yourself in the AI Profit Boardroom.

Also On Our Network

Pick a page-build model from the Landing scores, check your crawler access, and book a free strategy session to plan the human side with a GEO agency UK firms can trust.

FAQ

Does GoldieBench test SEO or GEO writing?

No. Its categories are Games, Visuals, Sims and Pages. The Landing task is the nearest proxy for building GEO pages.

Which models scored highest on the Landing task?

On 11 November 2026 the Landing page showed Fugu Ultra, Fusion, GLM-5.2 and Grok at 9.0/10, with GPT-5.6 Sol at 8.7/10.

Will a high-scoring model get my page cited by ChatGPT?

No. OpenAI says placement isn't guaranteed. Citations depend on crawler access, content quality and what the web says about you.

Can a model write my schema markup?

It can draft it, but GoldieBench doesn't test schema, so check every field against Google's Organization and LocalBusiness docs.

The same stack Julian uses

Run this stack yourself.

Every demo on this bench was built inside the Agent Operating System — one prompt, one shot, single HTML file out. The Agent OS, the prompts, the templates, the weekly walkthroughs and 3,400+ founders shipping with it every day all live inside the AI Profit Boardroom.

3,400+founders
258documented wins
38countries
4coaching calls a week